Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology Journal ; 9(2):71-73, 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2278185
2.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 31(4): 267-273, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1684919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience of a large American academic ophthalmology department from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to the early recovery phase in Summer 2020. METHODS: Retrospective review; description of approaches taken by our academic medical center and department regarding supply chain issues, protection of doctors and staff, elimination of nonurgent care, calls for staff and faculty deployment, and reopening. Comparison of surgical and clinic volumes in suburban locations versus the main campus; analysis of volumes compared with pre-pandemic periods. RESULTS: At our medical center, screening and precautions (such as the mask policy) continued to evolve from March through August 2020. Ophthalmologists were not allowed to use N95 respirators except in rare circumstances. Surgical and clinic volume dropped at both urban and suburban locations, but surgery rebounded more quickly at suburban surgery centers once elective procedures resumed. Mandates from administration were not always attainable. CONCLUSIONS: During respiratory pandemics such as COVID-19, medical centers should adopt protective measures that are consistent across inpatient and outpatient sectors and consistent with other institutions. Our department's large presence outside the urban center where the main hospital is located allowed faster return of clinical care overall. In the event of another pandemic, a central budget rather than individual divisional budgets should be used for purchase of protective equipment for health care workers of an academic center. Because outpatient care provides important continuity of care and keeps patients away from emergency departments and hospitals, perhaps outpatient care does not have to be curtailed to the extent it was in Spring-Summer 2020, provided that outpatient health care workers have sufficient staff and equipment and the above measures are in place.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ophthalmology , Ambulatory Care , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
3.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ; 22: 101074, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1135233

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a case of a patient presenting with unilateral keratouveitis associated with ocular hypertension six weeks after being discharged from the hospital for COVID-19. Ocular specimens were obtained for testing. OBSERVATIONS: A 69-year-old African American woman developed poor vision while hospitalized for COVID-19 in April but did not seek ophthalmic care until end of May. She had an edematous cornea, stromal keratitis, and highly elevated intraocular pressure by June. After lack of response to oral valacyclovir, aqueous fluid and swabs of her conjunctiva and limbal epithelium with corneal epithelium anterior to the limbus were sent for real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epithelium from the cornea and limbus was positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR; specimens from the other two ocular sites were negative. All specimens were negative for herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus. The patient refused further treatment despite intraocular pressure above 50 mm Hg at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although SARS-CoV-2 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) have been detected by PCR in the conjunctiva and tears of patients with acute respiratory infection, presence in corneal tissue has not been described. In addition, no one has studied whether ocular tissues in convalesced patients can harbor viral RNA. Here we describe unilateral keratouveitis in a convalesced patient whose corneal epithelium/limbal tissue was positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR. Further investigation is required to determine whether active viral replication or viral remnants account for this result.

5.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol ; 9(2): 71-73, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-525388
6.
Ophthalmology ; 127(7): 984-985, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-165023
7.
Non-conventional | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-268880

ABSTRACT

The proximity required of a thorough biomicroscopic slit-lamp examination may put ophthalmologists at increased risk for respiratory-borne infection with SARS-CoV-2. Conjunctivitis has been described in a few patients with COVID-19 and other coronavirus syndromes. Although SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the conjunctival secretions or tears of patients with COVID-19 and conjunctivitis, transmission of infection through respiratory droplets to ophthalmologists without eye protection or masks may be the bigger concern.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL